On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 12:04:15PM +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 22 ian 13, 15:50:19, Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 09:29:46PM +0000, Joe wrote: > > > > [...] > > > and there's still nothing Open Source that comes close to > > > Access. > > > > Which is good to know. > > Assuming one has the time and knowledge it is possible to use Access for > some smaller tasks that, if implemented "properly" would cost many > thousands of $hard_currency in feasibility studies, consulting, > commissioning, deployment, support infrastructure, etc. just to get a > buggy proprietary solution, designed by people who will never use it and > nobody (including IT support) knows how to fix if it doesn't work. > > IMNSHO a FLOSS Access replacement would be quite welcome (I haven't > looked at Libreoffice Base in a looong time). >
You might want to have a look at the Dabo framework <http://dabodev.com/>. Written in python by some ex-foxpro devs with data-oriented RAD in mind. dt -- Dave Thayer | Whenever you read a good book, it's like the Denver, Colorado USA | author is right there, in the room talking to d...@thayer-boyle.com | you, which is why I don't like to read | good books. - Jack Handey "Deep Thoughts" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130123031835.ga29...@thayer-boyle.com
