On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 09:30:22AM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:58:26PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > True, it's a single point of failure, but it's made by GNU, whose > > agenda is less harmful to Linux than the agenda of Redhat. > > I nearly choked on my coffee reading that. Redhat built their business on > Linux; GNU have been hostile towards it for years.
And the most interesting thing is that for many years glibc was maintained by Ulrich "Stop Reopening" Drepper who was paid by Red Hat for this task :) Glibc maintainer style was the main reason of glibc → eglibc transition in Debian. Reco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140924123631.GA6968@x101h
