Στις 27-10-2014 16:05, Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis έγραψε:
Στις 27-10-2014 14:53, Christian Seiler έγραψε:
To me a lot of the anti-systemd response here seems to be a purely
gut-driven emotional response. I realize that what kind of preferences
we have in the software we want to use has a large emotional
component.
For example, I don't think you can put my opinion of GNOME into purely
technical terms.[3] So I don't think that it's a bad thing for people
to
say "I am emotionally attached to sysvinit and want to keep using it",
but to rant against a dependency on something that DOES NOT PREVENT
YOU
from doing so, doesn't seem to be a very rational way of going about
things to me.
A quick search reveals the following.
I've a software that use libuuid. Until now, the uuidd had the ability
to start on-demand the uuidd if the later, quotting "... setuid to an
unprivileged user (e.g. uuidd:uuidd)".
After that commit[1], i'm forced to use systemd, if i don't want to
start uuidd from the beginning. That's new for me...
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/util-linux-ng/msg09698.html
fix: ... Until now, the libuuid had the ability to start on-demand the
uuidd ...
My point is that, systemd and it's ecosystem, pollutes my favourite OS.
Plain and simple. It's too intrusive.
Regards,
--
Dimitrios Chr. Ioannidis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/4472696391b302d188a2358515b1f...@nephelae.eu
