-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sat, Jan 02, 2016 at 08:52:24PM +1300, Richard Hector wrote:
[...] > I'm also aware that the respondents to this thread so far appear to be > (apologies if I'm mistaken) male; I'm not sure whether the women of > the list have deliberately withheld comment? This is unfortunate. But given the tone of half of the thread here, I was myself hesitant to even participate. I mean: one can agree with the OP or disagree -- but the amount of unnecessary sarcasm on display here can be... a bit off-putting. There have been many very reasonable posts, though. regards - -- tomás -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlaHficACgkQBcgs9XrR2kZswgCfe0B74w8vP1Y0IeleQYYNvwtt GG8AniVUqP/W7EOqR6X9YEmH9c67JC9I =YARh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----