On 2016-09-15 10:47:55 +0200, Andre Majorel wrote: > I must say, it baffles me that Lynx continues to get more > mentions than Elinks, Links and W3m together even though they > render HTML at least as well and usually better that Lynx. Or > have things changed in recent years ?
Links does not support UTF-8. The other ones do. -- Vincent Lefèvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
