On 15 June 2017 at 21:38, deloptes <delop...@gmail.com> wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 06/15/2017 02:10 PM, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hmm, am I feeding the spammer? [snip] > > > > Likely > > > >> > >> PS: aconcernedfossdev doesn't "command" much respect in my mind, > >> especially with no better explanation of the problem than what I read > >> here. > > > > +1 > > The story behind is really interesting and pretty long. I read about the > conflict perhaps 1/2y ago. Some of the accusations by GRSec make sense, > however they do not justify their policy. > In fact this is the best proof (IMO) how decentralized and open > idea/project/work etc fails. It fails on both ends the Linux and the GRSec > end because the first is not motivated to do good and the second to do good > for free it fails badly. > I do however think GRSec are wrong as the OP states, they clearly violate > the license agreements. > IMO everyone in the linux community should know the background of that > story > same as the background of systemd ... but there is sooo much to know >
When I read the OP's rhetorical question: Why does not one person here care? I was moved to say: because they are obsessed with systemd ........ But you have beaten me to the punch in a subtle way which I am both impressed and humbled by. MF regards > > > >
