On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 15:45:54 -0600, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 20:26:46 (+0000), Brian wrote: > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 13:13:18 -0600, David Wright wrote: > > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 18:06:34 (+0000), Brian wrote: > > > > On Mon 05 Feb 2018 at 12:53:36 -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2018 at 05:31:29PM +0000, Brian wrote: > > > > > > AfAIK. there isn't any way to determine whether a message posted to > > > > > > -user is from a non-subscriber. > > > > > > > > > > I believe some people are using the one of the X-Spam* headers > > > > > and looking for the LDOSUBSCRIBER substring. Which is extremely > > > > > non-obvious, and probably not a vector that ordinary users can > > > > > easily pursue. > > > > > > > > The presence of LDOSUBSCRIBER indicates the post is from a subscribed > > > > member. It absence tells you nothing about whether the person (as > > > > indicted by the From: header) is subscribed or not. > > > > > > Agreed; I've never earned the privilege of that in my header. > > > I've sometimes wondered whether that's the reason I occasionally > > > fall foul of the spam filter, and have to re-post. > > > > I cannot account for that (and I doubt listmaster will enlighten us) but > > this mail of yours has > > > > Received: from david by alum with local (Exim 4.80) > > > > (envelope-from <david@alum>) > > > > id 1eimCc-0000EV-Nv; Mon, 05 Feb 2018 13:13:18 -0600 > > > > Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) > > > > by bendel.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP > > > > id B714B37A; Mon, 5 Feb 2018 19:13:44 +0000 (UTC) > > > > Very timely. > > Is that meant to tell me something (as you wrote "but")?
I recived B714B37A 26 seconds after you posted it. Just thought you would like the comfort of knowing your mail traversed the system just as quickly as others do. -- Brian.
