On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:48:03 -0400 songbird said: > # systemctl mask saned.service saned.socket saned@.socket
> previous masking of sane items made no difference to that issue and > i still think they may be related issues. Man page for saned(8) talks only about saned.socket and saned@.service but it can possibly be under-documented. Perhaps it might be worthwhile to add saned@.service to the mask list as a last ditch masking effort, though. Regards -- Abdullah Ramazanoglu
