Abdullah Ramazanoglu wrote: > On Sun, 8 Apr 2018 13:48:03 -0400 songbird said: > >> # systemctl mask saned.service saned.socket saned@.socket > >> previous masking of sane items made no difference to that issue and >> i still think they may be related issues. > > Man page for saned(8) talks only about saned.socket and saned@.service > but it can possibly be under-documented. Perhaps it might be > worthwhile to add saned@.service to the mask list as a last ditch > masking effort, though.
done. we'll see... tks. :) songbird