On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 01:34:31PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 07:30:42PM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 06:42:50PM +0200, Hans wrote:
> > > Am Samstag, 31. Juli 2021, 14:05:59 CEST schrieb Nicolas George:
> > > > Gunnar Gervin (12021-07-31):
> > > 
> > > > Just:
> > > > 
> > > > cp /path/to/file.iso /dev/sdX
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > isn't it just:
> > > 
> > > dd if=whatever.iso of=/dev/sdX  
> > 
> > It's up to taste. Some get worked up one way or the other.
> > This discussion comes around cyclically :)
> > 
> > Personally, I settled on dd, mainly because oflag=sync and
> > status=progress. But I'm OK with others using copy, cat or
> > whatever :)
> 
> If you're going to use dd for this, be sure to increase the block size
> from the default 512 bytes to something more appropriate in this century.

Absolutely. I actually run some tests from time to time, and the
general pattern is a very flat maximum somewhere beyond 64 and
below 1G. I tend to use 1M, because it's easy to memorise :)

Cheers
 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to