On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 06:55:45 +0800 Bret Busby <b...@busby.net> wrote:
> Since you have entered into the realm of grammar and grammatical > corrections... > > I believe that the "do" that you originally used, is as correct as > the "DID" that you (incorrectly) corrected - the poster will still > mean what the person originally meant, so both present and past tense > could be said to be correct (although, the use of the uppercase > characters, in the "DID" that you did post, is questionable). > > Of more concern, and, something for you to consider, in considering > your grammar, is the "should of been" in your "corrective" post, > which instead, should have been "should have been"... > > :) > CRIKEY! lol sorry I couldn't resist after seeing your signature! :) Sometimes that happens to the best of us, we read something and we're like " That doesn't sound right to me, let me change it". You then correct what you said and read it out loud before hitting send and your mind is like " That sounds a lot better" when its ACTUALLY WRONG! :( haha! ==================== Thanks, Chris If you need to email me off list, please use ch...@cwm030.com Debian 11 Gnome 3
