On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 08:00:51PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Fri, Jun 09, 2023 at 05:45:04PM -0500, S M wrote: > > Regarding a workaround, I ended up creating a symlink /usr/local/bin/sh > > pointing to bash and chsh to that. > > Why? Why not simply chsh to /bin/bash if that's what you want as your > interactive shell? > > Are you somehow relying on bash's disabling of certain features when > invoked as "sh", in interactive mode? I don't understand that at all. >
Yes. POSIX-compliance is a feature to me. I'd actually be fine with using dash itself but the lack of command line editing and filename completion is a deal-breaker to me.