Hello,

> With free software, it might not be too costly to try out
> suggestions like Putty. But I speak as someone with a university
> background, not a company one. We might have had a bit more
> freedom to mess around, and even mess up. And a small base of
> sophisticated users rather than a large number of likely
> unskilled users

Your academic perspective is appreciated, and it is true that in the 
professional world, especially in the retail sector, compatibility with 
specific peripherals is crucial for the smooth operation of operations.

> From a position of ignorance, I would have thought that serial
> pass-through printing is necessarily bidirectional, if only for
> flow-control, but UARTs can do that in hardware with RTS/CTS.
> So it's unlikely that that's enough to support what the OP wants,
> which is probably things like ink/paper supply or, when there's
> a cash drawer installed, drawer open/closed; typical POS stuff.
> And that's without taking into account the peripherals mentioned
> above.

Regarding the use of Putty, it appears that in some cases, it can partially 
meet our needs by allowing interactions such as printing tickets and opening 
the cash drawer. However, i also mentioned that some other operations do not 
work. It is important to note that Putty is primarily designed as a terminal 
emulator and may not be equipped to meet all the specific requirements of our 
retail application.

As for the evolution of Putty, it is understandable that the developer has not 
responded to our contact attempts, and we respect their decision to maintain 
the software according to their own criteria.

I also pointed out that we have proprietary emulator solutions that come with 
integrated hardware offerings, such as Wyse-type client terminals or Android 
tablets. These solutions meet our needs and provide the necessary services at a 
given cost. I just to emphasize that the diversity of options, whether open 
source or proprietary, is a wealth, as it allows each company to find the 
solution that best suits its needs.

Ultimately, our goal is to find the best solution for our retail application, 
taking into account hardware compatibility, required features, and associated 
costs. While we are open to exploring open-source solutions if they can meet 
our needs, we also value the reliability and support that proprietary solutions 
can provide. We will continue to evaluate all available options, ensuring that 
we choose the approach that best aligns with our business requirements and 
technical considerations.

Regards,
Thierry

Reply via email to