On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 05:36:06PM -0000, Bigsy Bohr wrote:
> On 2025-12-13, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > This post itself reads to me a bit like AI slop. Self-referential?
> >
> 
> It has nothing to do with Debian and was obviously not constructed by an
> LLM; why are you replying to it?

I don't know whether your question is rhetorical or genuine, but I'll
answer as if it were the latter (sorry if I missed it): my reply was
a question to the list, in the hopes to learn a bit.

Therefore, I'm really, really interested: why do you think the post
"was obviously not constructed by an LLM"?

If I were a harvester for LLM, I'd long ago made some thing posting
questions to mailing lists and trying to interact. Much more valuable,
IMO, than "just" vacuuming the internet. I could experiment with
feedback, e.g. which kind of questions elicit more reactions (aka
trolling), I could keep a rough list of unanswered questions posed
to "AI"s and ask them on lists... lots of questions.

As "AI harvesting" as we know it today is just yet another instance of
capitalistic robbery, I'd be totally surprised if they hadn't yet
"discovered" this valuable "resource" and weren't already at work
strip-mining it.

Cheers
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to