On Sun, Sep 20, 2026 at 03:18:12PM -0000, CGS wrote: > On 2026-09-19, Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Isn't significant part of this thread is dedicated to arguments that you > >> should not disable IPv6? > > > > No-one has explained why IPv6 should not be disabled. And in any case, > > Conversely, have you explained why IPv6 was disabled? I may have missed > it in this long thread, but it obviously adds a layer of complexity to > whatever problem you're trying to solve as an non-priviledged user.
Yes, it was explained in this thread. AFAIR, the box receives IPv6 router advertisements, so it thinks it has IPv6 connectivity, but the routes lead to nowhere. Correct me if I'm wrong, though. Cheers -- t
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
