On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:32:03PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > The requisite discussion period having been entertained, I therefore > formally call for a vote on this topic, on the Resolution which I > originally posted on June 7, 2000, a copy of which is included below. your CFV is unconstitutional because nothing in the consitution allows the Social Contract or DFSG to be amended. craig -- craig sanders -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Non-free archive removal Matthew Vernon
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Buddha Buck
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Matthew Vernon
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony Towns Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Proposed amendment by Antho... Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Anthony Towns
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remova... Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive re... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive re... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive re... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive re... Jordi Mallach

