Craig Sanders wrote:
> the facts do support what i say. the debian constitution states what
> documents may be created or modified by vote, yet fails to mention that
> either the social contract or the DFSG may be so modified.
> 
> what this means is that you can't call for a vote to change either of
> those two documents without first getting the constitution amended to
> allow it.

I don't follow your reasoning. In the first paragraph, you seem to be
implying that the Social contract is not a document, since simply
stating documents may be modified isn't good enough. Then in the second
paragraph, you refer to it as a document.

-- 
see shy jo


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to