Craig Sanders wrote: > the facts do support what i say. the debian constitution states what > documents may be created or modified by vote, yet fails to mention that > either the social contract or the DFSG may be so modified. > > what this means is that you can't call for a vote to change either of > those two documents without first getting the constitution amended to > allow it. I don't follow your reasoning. In the first paragraph, you seem to be implying that the Social contract is not a document, since simply stating documents may be modified isn't good enough. Then in the second paragraph, you refer to it as a document. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Buddha Buck
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Matthew Vernon
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony Towns Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony T... Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Anthony Towns
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt

