Adam Heath wrote:
> Issue, but doesn't say a thing about modifying preexisting documents and
> statements.
So we issue DFSG v2, a new document that just happens to include the
text of DFSG v1 verbatim, except for oner paragraph.
> This is the same as the old "Who does Debian Admin answer to?" thread.
It seems more like the "I don't want this to happen, so I will be a
rules lawyer" thread to me.
--
see shy jo, who doesn't like the GR, but dislikes apptempts to
prevent it by rules-lawyering even less.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony Towns Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Proposed amendment by Anthony T... Chris Lawrence
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Anthony Towns
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal John Goerzen
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Steve Greenland
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Adam Heath
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joseph Carter
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Jordi Mallach
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Manoj Srivastava
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Joey Hess
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive remov... Craig Sanders
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Hamish Moffatt
- Re: CFV: Non-free archive removal Branden Robinson

