On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 01:43:17AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Per section A.5 ("Expiry") of the constitution, I must point out that both
> John Goerzen's General Resolution regarding non-free, and Anthony Towns's
> amended version thereof (which per A.1.3 stands on its own as an
> independent GR since John Goerzen did not accept it) have expired.
Now what, ...
do we have to vote on the quite confusing ballot, or do we not, or is all of
this just an attempt to confuse people before the vote ?
Or should we vote to see if the previous ballot is still valid ?
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5 Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Sven LUTHER
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Gopal Narayanan
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Anthony Towns
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Shane Wegner
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... Joseph Carter
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Brendan O'Dea

