Shane Wegner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There was a proposal in a previous thread to require a 3/1 > majority on such documents I believe. Would it not make > sense to vote on that proposal in order to determine if a > 3/1 vote is actually supported by Debian developers? It would. The timing is unfortunate. -- John -- John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.complete.org Sr. Software Developer, Progeny Linux Systems, Inc. www.progenylinux.com #include <std_disclaimer.h> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5 Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Sven LUTHER
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Gopal Narayanan
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Anthony Towns
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Shane Wegner
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... John Goerzen
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... Joseph Carter
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Brendan O'Dea
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Joseph Carter
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Con... Hamish Moffatt
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Raul Miller
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Branden Robinson
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Thomas Bushnell, BSG
- Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constit... Raul Miller

