Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5

[Shane Wegner]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:42:17PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> It also scares me that people seem to be extending the Secretary's
> power to "interpret" the constitution to "amend the Constitution
> whenever he feels like it."
> 
> I repeat again:
> 
> THERE IS NO PROVISION IN THE CONSTITUTION FOR REQUIRING A
> SUPERMAJORITY FOR THIS GR.
> 
> How can the Secretary interpret something that is absent?

There was a proposal in a previous thread to require a 3/1
majority on such documents I believe.  Would it not make
sense to vote on that proposal in order to determine if a
3/1 vote is actually supported by Debian developers?

Cheers,
Shane

-- 
Shane Wegner: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
              http://www.cm.nu/~shane/
PGP:          1024D/FFE3035D
              A0ED DAC4 77EC D674 5487
              5B5C 4F89 9A4E FFE3 035D


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]