> > Ah, never retain from a ad-hominem attacks, eh?

On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 12:00:58AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Oh, come on. That was not an argument, therefore it cannot *possibly*
> be an instance of argumentum ad hominem.

How is missing the point of what he said relevant?

-- 
Raul


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to