Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not everybody reads the text as you so it is just an interpretation.
This is not sufficient. You must explain how your interpretation is more plausible or likely. If it is just an ad-hoc thing, designed only to get the particular conclusion you want for this case, then Manoj is on solid ground. I have not yet seen such an interpretation of this sort, in which explanation and analysis of similar cases and such is proffered. This does not mean it cannot be done, but it has not. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
