On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:20:31AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Not everybody reads the text as you so it is just an interpretation. > > This is not sufficient. You must explain how your interpretation is > more plausible or likely. If it is just an ad-hoc thing, designed > only to get the particular conclusion you want for this case, then > Manoj is on solid ground. > > I have not yet seen such an interpretation of this sort, in which > explanation and analysis of similar cases and such is proffered. This > does not mean it cannot be done, but it has not.
This interpretation is not ad-hoc thing and I strongly belive that it represents not only my view but also the view of FSF. I asked Richard Stallman for confirmation and I will report here when I receive his reply. Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
