On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:53:00PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Well, i think we are going to have too many options on that ballot, i think > > we > > should do some rationalizing at some point, and keep only a few which will > > represent most opinions, and work on polishing their wordings instead of > > everyone proposing their pet proposal. > > I agree, but it's probably inevitable because Steve Langasek made > this a compound proposal, mixing issues, and there are many different > combinations which would resolve it. Also, our voting is clone-proof, > so hopefully it won't damage the chances of finding the best possible > solution. Even so, this option is quite different to the others so far. > > [...] > > Why do you mention the admin section of the non-free archive ? I mean, > > sections are mostly obsolet with the new pool structure, and it is not clear > > what is meant here. > > I mean packages with a Section: control field of non-free/admin. Even if > it's mostly obsolete, ftpmasters and others are still regulating it, yes?
notice that non-free firmware modules just uploaded where uploaded to non-free/base. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
