[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> This may include proprietary kernel drivers and will exclude important >> firmwares which are not legally modifiable. Both too much and too little >> at the same time. >How would you exclude proprietary kernel drivers while allowing important >firmwares which are not legally modifiable? Firmwares do not run on the same CPU controlled by the OS, etc. The difference has already been discussed on this mailing list.
>Do you think that Steve Langasek's original proposal would exclude/allow >those in that way? It obviously did not include proprietary drivers. It did not include more restrictively licensed firmwares either, but it was not supposed to. >> I would otherwise support a similar amendment, but I >> in this form I consider it harmful to our cause. >Prove it. I should prove that Debian distributing illegal proprietary kernel drivers would really be a bad idea? I have better things to do with my time. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
