Sam Hartman <[email protected]> writes: > I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the G+D > proposal weakens option G alone. > > [1]: > > https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected]
Later in that thread ( Message-ID: <[email protected]> ) Guillem explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy about G+D appearing on the ballot: " Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of subtext implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the new proposal: " So it is clear to me that G+D should be on the ballot. Regards, Matthew -- "At least you know where you are with Microsoft." "True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle." http://www.debian.org
