>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon <[email protected]> writes:
Matthew> Sam Hartman <[email protected]> writes:
>> I read [1], Guillem's message talking about how he believes the
>> G+D proposal weakens option G alone.
>>
>> [1]:
>>
https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/[email protected]
Matthew> Later in that thread ( Message-ID:
Matthew> <[email protected]> ) Guillem
Matthew> explicitly rebuts the suggestion that they are unhappy
Matthew> about G+D appearing on the ballot:
Matthew> " Just to clarify, and to avoid any possible reading of
Matthew> subtext implying I'm unhappy with the combination in the
Matthew> new proposal: "
Ah, reading that message for the second time, I agree with your
intrepretation.
It was less clear to me on first reading.
