Richard Laager <[email protected]> writes: > I agree insofar as: E > B > C > NOTA > D
> I put A in a different spot: A > B > C. You have B > C > A. > E is A plus the SC modification. With E as your first choice, why > wouldn't you put A > B? I'm concerned about the potential complications of a conflict with the SC and would rather accept a different compromise than risk constitutional confusion if we're not willing to change the SC. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
