Le Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 10:23:05AM +0200, Simon Josefsson a écrit : > > However, I'm pointing out that Debian generally follows a different > > tactic. And I don't think that it would be a good idea for Debian to > > switch tactics. > > Right, I agree, although my perception is that Debian is another > lighthouse here, and that this is fine. Debians' DFSG and the rejection > of GFDL Invariant sections are ridiculed elsewhere much the same way the > FSF's positions on non-free firmware is ridiculed here. I happen to > like these lighthouse properties of both Debian and the FSF, as it helps > me navigate the free software sea. I don't think FSF or Debian would > have been as successful as they have been without these lighthouse > properties. > > I agree it doesn't make sense for either organization to change > approach. I do believe that what we are seeing in this vote, however, > is that Debian _is_ changing tactics: rather than providing a 100% free > Debian (guided by the DSC/DFSG) and using that as a tactic to change the > world, Debian will (under A/E) provide a 99% free Debian.
This is how I feel too. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
