Le Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 12:37:08PM +0200, Philip Hands a écrit : > Simon Josefsson <[email protected]> writes: > > ... > > I agree it doesn't make sense for either organization to change > > approach. I do believe that what we are seeing in this vote, however, > > is that Debian _is_ changing tactics: rather than providing a 100% free > > Debian (guided by the DSC/DFSG) and using that as a tactic to change the > > world, Debian will (under A/E) provide a 99% free Debian. > > Stretching that metaphor a little: making non-free firmware available > in the installer strikes me as equivalent to offering Wellington boots > to new arrivals at the beach, so that they can wade across the muddy > patch to get to the nice dry, sandy bit of beach where we play barefoot.
Yes, but this is not the question at hand. Nobody is suggesting that the non-free installer should not exist, but whether it should be considered part of Debian or part of non-free. Debian tradition of clearly seperating free and non-free should be upholded. Cheers, -- Bill. <[email protected]> Imagine a large red swirl here.
