Matthias Geiger <[email protected]> writes: > Sorry, but I fail to see how code generated by LLMs can ever comply with > the DFSG. TTBOMK no model exists that a) was solely trained on > DFSG-software, b) has DFSG-compatible licensing on itself and c) denotes > from where in the training data the output comes from.
A very substantial number of our upstreams including our only available kernel have decided that none of these concerns matter and they're going to ignore all licensing issues around LLM output. Whether we like it or not, I don't think Debian realistically has enough leverage to change that position. At this point, the ship is sufficiently sailed that I think only direct government involvement (which at least in the US does not seem likely) would make a difference. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
