Quoting Matthias Geiger (2026-07-22 19:45:34) > On Wed, 22 Jul 2026 19:30, Pierre-Elliott Bécue <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > >Hello, > > > [...] > > > >These apply exclusively to code and work done specifically for the > >Debian project (Debian websites, applications, resources, packages, > >etc.). They do not apply to any upstream work. In what follows, "work" > >refers to work covered by these guidelines. > > > > - All code and work assisted by a generative AI agent or tool must > > comply with the DFSG. > > - The submitter is solely responsible for the submitted work and, by > > submitting it, certifies that: > > + any generated code has been reviewed and audited; > > + all licensing-compliance duties have been fulfilled; > > > Sorry, but I fail to see how code generated by LLMs can ever comply with > the DFSG. TTBOMK no model exists that a) was solely trained on > DFSG-software, b) has DFSG-compatible licensing on itself and c) denotes > from where in the training data the output comes from.
Already today, human Debian contributors exist that use non-free tooling like Gmail, and most likely human Debian contributors exist that are trained on non-free licensed data. So I fail to undertand the argument above. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
