Bonjour,
Le 22/07/2026 à 21:31, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
Hi,
On 22/07/26 at 17:35 +0200, Matthias Geiger wrote:
Hi all,
What follows is a GR proposal to ban LLM contributions.
I would like to propose the following ballot option.
This is the GR proposal from
https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/02/msg00000.html with
amendments from the discussion back then.
BEGIN PROPOSAL
# Allow AI-Assisted Contributions
Using its power under Constitution section 4.1 (5), the project issues the
following statement describing its current position on AI-assisted
contributions. This statement describes the position of the project at the
time it is adopted. That position may evolve as time passes without the need
to resort to future general resolutions. The GR process remains available if
the project needs a decision and cannot come to a consensus.
The Debian project recognizes that AI-assisted contributions raise many
concerns, e.g. about the technical quality and maintainability of such
contributions, and their legal status. AI itself also raises additional
concerns, about its impact on society at large, on the IT industry and on
Free Software; about its environmental impact; and the aggressive or
non-compliant practices of AI scrapers.
Nevertheless, many Debian contributors find AI tools helpful when
contributing to Debian, and ultimately for improving Debian.
Given both the benefits and risks of AI assistance, and the controversial
discussions within the community, the Debian project finds it necessary to
clarify its position on AI-assisted contributions and establish clear
guidelines.
The Debian project allows AI-assisted contributions (partially or fully
generated by an LLM), provided the following conditions are met:
1. **Legal Compatibility:** Contributors should ensure that the terms and
conditions of the generative AI tool do not impose contractual
restrictions that conflict with the distribution, modification, or use of
the output in the context of Debian.
2. **Licensing and Attribution:** If any pre-existing copyrighted materials
(including pre-existing code licensed as free software) authored or owned
by third parties are included in the AI tool’s output, prior to
contributing such output to the project, the contributor should verify
that such materials are available under a compatible license.
Additionally, the contributor should provide notice and attribution of
such third party rights, along with information about the applicable
license terms, with their contribution.
3. **Accountability:** Contributors assume full responsibility for their
contributions, including vouching for the technical merit, security,
license compliance, and utility of their submissions. The contributor
remains solely accountable for the entirety of these contributions.
Contributors should fully understand the proposed changes and be prepared
to justify them.
4. **Explicit Disclosure:** When a significant portion of the contribution
is taken from a tool without manual modification, contributors should
disclose the tool's use. This may be recorded using Git trailers, such as
`Generated-By:` or `Assisted-By:`.
5. **Prior Discussion of Bulk or Automated Changes:** Similarly to the
mass-bug filing process (Developers Reference section 7.1.1),
contributors should discuss their intention before submitting bulk or
autonomously generated contributions. Any such automated process should
be overseen by a human who remains accountable for its behavior and
output.
6. **Community Courtesy:** To respect the preferences of project members who
wish to avoid AI-generated content, contributors should clearly label
such content in mailing list and bug discussions (e.g., by identifying
such content with a clear disclaimer or a machine-readable tag like
`[AI-Generated]`).
7. **Confidentiality and Privacy:** Contributors must not use generative AI
tools that transmit data to untrusted providers with non-public or
sensitive project information (such as embargoed security reports or
private communication), as this may lead to the unintended disclosure of
confidential data.
END PROPOSAL
I second this option.
Sylvestre
