Hi Simon, On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 10:45:15AM +0900, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > On 7/24/26 3:57 AM, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: > > > > 4. **Explicit Disclosure:** When a significant portion of the contribution > > > is taken from a tool without manual modification, contributors should > > > disclose the tool's use. This may be recorded using Git trailers, > > > such as > > > `Generated-By:` or `Assisted-By:`. > > > I'd avoid proposing the tool here. I fear our commits will be infected by > > badly > > intended promotion of this or that tool. Perhaps you could rephrase it a > > bit to > > encourage the disclosure of AI usage, without mentioning the tool behind it > > specifically? > > No, we need a single standardized machine-readable way.
I don't disagree, but is the current GR really the best place to define such a standard? I'm not sure, but I'm open to hearing more. > The jury is still out on whether AI generated code can be copyrighted, and > if the decision ends up being that it cannot, we need to delete the > corresponding copyright attributions (as far as they don't overlap with > valid ones). To be honest, I'm inclined to think it's perhaps too early for a vote, so I believe it's preferable to have less prescriptive ballots at this point. Bests, -- Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
