On 23 Jul 2026, at 12:04, Christian Kastner <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2026-07-23 10:51, Marc Haber wrote: >> I don't think it's far-fetched that, within two years, virtually all >> relevant software development will be done with AI assistance. If we >> reject that outright, we'll become irrelevant. > I agree with this. The tools have become just too useful. > > I think this would be true even if evolution of these tools stopped > today. They are just too good. > > I don't see how the world is better of if we force ourselves to waste > our lives doing some laborious chore, when a tool can do it for me. > > Just like we have compilers, so that we don't have to hand-write > assembly anymore.
LLMs and compilers are very different in their nature, and as someone whose day job is working on compilers quite frankly it’s insulting how much people want to say LLMs are the same for code. Compilers are engineered to follow input and output specifications and generally any miscompilation is regarded as a serious bug. LLMs are a roll of the dice where you pray you get something sensible out, and if you don’t, that’s just accepted as a thing that happens, and you have to pull the slot machine arm again after another prayer. Jessica
