Sean Whitton <[email protected]> writes: > - It clearly distinguishes including LLM output in what gets committed > from other uses of LLMs for software development, as I have been > repeatedly advocating is important, without much uptake.
For the record, I also strongly agree with this distinction. Sean is not alone. That doesn't mean I think LLM-based analysis tools are devoid of problems, but incorporating substantial portions (substantial in terms of semantics, not in terms of lines of mechanical changes) of LLM-generated code adds additional risks and concerns that use of LLMs for code analysis does not. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
