Aigars Mahinovs <[email protected]> writes: > You've missed significant exceptions that GCC policy grants
I wasn't specifically referring to the GCC policy at all. I was agreeing with and picking up on Sean and Russ' about the importance of distinguishing between AI-generated code and AI assistance while writing code. I should have changed the email subject, sorry. > - grant on changes below "legally significant" limit (~15 lines of > code) Instinctually to me, there's so little to be gained from automating the writing of ~15 lines of code that I'm not very worried about this. > and grant to on adding tests True. > as well as writing aids, including spell check, translation, > speech-to-text and reverse and so on. They also make a point that AI > patch review is fine. Spell-check and AI patch review are explicitly fine under my draft ballot suggestion. Is there anything in the language that makes it seem not fine? I must admit I haven't given much thought to speech-to-text and translation. Thanks for raising those points. Best, Gard
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
