On Mon, 3 Aug 2026 at 10:11, Gard Spreemann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Is this really what we're discussing though? I can see why one would
> want an AI policy not to bar on copyright grounds something that is not
> copyrightable in the first place. That's reasonable. But I don't think
> it's what people really mean when they're concerned about
> copyright.
The wording of the proposals bans *all* contributions where AI is used in
their creation, without any regard to the copyrightability of the
contribution itself.
So that is why the argument is proposed, that if teh copyright *is* the key
concern, then the policy should not apply to contrubitions small enough not
to be considered as copyrightable and do so explicitly.
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs
