On 26.02.2018 21:50, Brett Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:25 PM, Timo Aaltonen <tjaal...@debian.org> wrote:
>> just wondering (again) if glslang should be
>> packaged separately or not. Because now would be the time to do it.
> FWIW, after digging further down this rabbit hole, I think you made
> the right call by not wanting to package them in the same source
> package as libvulkan. The upstream maintainer has agreed to start
> versioning/tagging the glslang repository, so that makes it much more
> sensible to package it separately. And there are people who want/use
> glslang for OpenGL/OpenCL who have nothing to do with vulkan, so it
> really should be independent anyway.
I've pushed spirv-headers, -tools and glslang here:
spirv-headers was uploaded already, but -tools needs some bikeshedding
on how to split it, and glslang obviously needs this information for