Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote: > Hi, any reason against this tag? Anyone else would find it useful?
The devel:: facet is already effectively a use::devel: subsystem, so a generic use::development would be somewhat redundant... unless perhaps there were a lot of unclassifiable misc-devel packages without appropriate devel:: tags. In that case they'd be candidates for a use::development tag; if they exist, I'm not recognising them, but that's perfectly possible. Or if you're thinking of some large specific category of development tasks not catered for by the current tags, it would be best to try to create a new tag for devel::whatever. But the only thing I see currently tagged "devel::TODO" is dak, and I don't see the reasoning for that one. -- JBR Ankh kak! (Ancient Egyptian blessing) _______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
