On Saturday 10 September 2005 14:51, Enrico Zini wrote: > But when one looks inside 'use', the facet does not have a 'developing' > tag, while that is indeed one of the main activities people do with > Debian. I wouldn't mind adding it, for completeness sake. Then maybe > later on we can decide to graft the devel:: tags inside use::developing. > > So, uhm, I'd be in favour of adding use::developing actually. Hmm, about developing, my dictionary says it, as a noun, means processing of photosensitive material. The process of something being developed is probably development. IMHO. Re use::devel:xy, that will grow use:: another fair amount, do we really want such huge facets? I would probably prefer to have the other aspects of the use in separate facets. Also, devel::* would imply use::development (i keep forgetting what's the plan with implications). And use::development should (not must, but IMO should) imply presence of at least one devel:: tag. If this is the case, there comes a two-way relationship, that would make it possible to hide the whole implied facet for the first iteration of filtering (keeping in mind that you really don't want to present more than a few facets for starters).
Yours,
Peter.
--
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com | +421907533216
http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net
"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
-- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation
pgpJaSpcza9QQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
