On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:59:09AM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: > Peter Rockai (mornfall) wrote: > > Hi, any reason against this tag? Anyone else would find it useful? > The devel:: facet is already effectively a use::devel: subsystem, so > a generic use::development would be somewhat redundant... unless > perhaps there were a lot of unclassifiable misc-devel packages > without appropriate devel:: tags. In that case they'd be candidates > for a use::development tag; if they exist, I'm not recognising them, > but that's perfectly possible.
But when one looks inside 'use', the facet does not have a 'developing' tag, while that is indeed one of the main activities people do with Debian. I wouldn't mind adding it, for completeness sake. Then maybe later on we can decide to graft the devel:: tags inside use::developing. So, uhm, I'd be in favour of adding use::developing actually. Ciao, Enrico -- GPG key: 1024D/797EBFAB 2000-12-05 Enrico Zini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debtags-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/debtags-devel
