What if you were to hold them, but then set up a scheduled job that runs once per hour or so. That job would:
1. copy all held messages back to the queue for delivery. 2. move all held messages into a review directory (to clear the hold area for next time. The result would be almost the same (except for the headers). Copying the hold area's contents back to the queue will get them delivered. Moving them to the review directory will let you see them when you get time. This approach might be the start of what you are looking for anyway. Hope this helps, _M | -----Original Message----- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Todd Ryan | Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 3:44 PM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Newbie question... | | | Hi all, | | Just installed JunkMail Pro with the default settings. Did some | tests using | "rsp set off" and I'm getting the warning in the headers as | expected. What | an awesome product, Scott! | | Since I've received over 100 spam messages in the last 40 minutes | (from the | log info), I'm quickly realizing that I'm going to want to do some close | monitoring. | | This thing is chock full of tweaks and settings so I have a | feeling this is | possible. Just didn't see it in the documentation or the list archives. | Forgive me if this has been covered before... | | While testing...I'd like to do something similar to WARN and HOLD at the | same time. That is, let the message go through but keep a copy for | evaluation when I have time. This could be either in the | \spool\spam folder | or forwarded/copied to a dummy account and checked via email. | | I'm just worried that if I HOLD them, I wouldn't be able to | dedicate enough | time to checking the spam folder regularly and processing them in an | acceptable timeframe to get the legit ones through. If I can | hold a *COPY* | then I won't need to check a hundred or more every hour. I can | scan through | them once a day or so and won't have to worry about getting the false | positives back into the queue quickly. | | I thought about using WARN and an IMail Rule to copy them to | another folder | (based on the X-RBL header) but I rememeberd that IMail won't let you copy | another folder based on a rule, just forward. There's got to be | another way | to make this happen, right? | | Thanks! | | --Todd. | | | | --- | [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com . --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
