Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Sniffer vs. SURBL

[Matt]

Let me re-summarize because I think that both you and Andy misunderstood different elements of what I said. First, Sniffer doesn't miss 11% of spam unless there was something wrong.  The stats provided were likely inaccurate for one reason or another. Second, Sniffer does cross checking with SURBL for creating new rules of certain types, though I'm not sure what the totality of the lists used.  One should be aware of the potential of double hitting based on pretty much the same data and weight accordingly. Matt Bill Landry wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> My fault for mixing up names in this case. I was thinking about the combined URIBL zone and not your version of the checker. The issue that I was really intending to speak to was the combined zone (multi.surbl.org) that some people are using over SURBL alone. Multi is a bit-masked URIBL. It will return a single response for a single test match or multiple test match. The only difference in using multi versus the individual tests is a single query versus multiple. If you don't want to use all of the tests available via multi, don't define them all. Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ =====================================================