SP>> That would happen if there was no IP address to test for the remote server. It could happen if, for example, you have Declude bypass your backup mail server, and that mail server doesn't record the IP address. << Nope - that's not the case here. Look at the header one more time, please. You'll see that the remote host is "mtlmailrouter.cranesupply.com [207.107.10.2]". My backup SMTP server is not involved. Still, the DECLUDE-NOTE header lists a remote host of "null string". Received: from mtlmailrouter.cranesupply.com [207.107.10.2] by mail.webhost.hm-software.com (SMTPD32-6.06) id A3F21CB900A8; Sat, 12 May 2001 11:17:06 -0400 Received: from sdbrn.msn.com [24.216.191.15] by mtlmailrouter.cranesupply.com (SMTPD32-4.03) id A0CB1E4A0218; Sat, 12 May 2001 11:03:39 EST From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Take my hand, and get out of Debt... [hgnvd] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 12 May 101 11:03:43 EST Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Declude-Note: SMTP headers violate RFCs - bad headers [c0104202] X-RBL-Warning: Suspected SPAM. Failed heuristic test - SPAM [1.000000] X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [207.107.10.2] X-Declude-Spoolname: D53f20a8.SMD X-Declude-Note: Processed by Declude 1.21a; remote host . PS: What's the story with your garbled list server subject field. For the last two days, I always see garbled text such as: "RE: X-RBL-Warning: %WARNING%REVDNS:Re: [Declude.JunkMail] 1.21b Improved - but Headers stillbroken!" but my subject was just "Re: 1.21b Improved - but Headers stillbroken!" Best Regards Andy --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
