>Given this CONFIG File:
>
>BADHEADERS      badheaders      x       x       5       0
>SPAMHEADERS     spamheaders     x       x       3       0
>SPAMROUTING     spamrouting     x       x       4       0
>REVDNS          revdnsexists    x       x       5       0
>HEUR10          heuristics      10      x       4       0
>HEUR9           heuristics      9       x       4       0
>HEUR8           heuristics      8       x       3       0
>HEUR            heuristics
>
>WEIGHT10        weight          x       x       10      0
>WEIGHT8         weight          x       x       8       0
>
>why doesn't the second log entry report that weight8 and/or weight10 has
>been exceeded?
>
>11/04/2001 03:39:42 Qfec315c Msg failed SPAMHEADERS (This E-mail has headers
>consistent with spam [60000303].).
>11/04/2001 03:39:42 Qfec315c Msg failed SPAMROUTING (This E-mail was routed
>in a poor manner consistent with spam [60000303].).
>11/04/2001 03:39:42 Qfec315c Msg failed REVDNS (This E-mail was sent from a
>mail server with no reverse DNS entry.).

It should.  It's possible that there is a per-user or per-domain 
configuration that doesn't include the WEIGHT8 or WEIGHT10 test, which 
would account for this.  Note that the WEIGHT8/WEIGHT10 tests will only get 
displayed in the log if they are being used for that E-mail.

 > Here's the opposite problem - when *I* add up the weight, only get 14 - but
 > the log claims a value of 18. How does this compute?
 > ORDB ip4r relays.ordb.org *
 > SPAMCOP ip4r bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2 7 0
 > ...
 > BADHEADERS badheaders x x 5 0
 > SPAMHEADERS spamheaders x x 3 0
 > SPAMROUTING spamrouting x x 4 0
 > ...
 > WEIGHT10 weight x x 10 0
 > WEIGHT8 weight x x 8 0

 > 11/04/2001 03:57:02 Q02d5274 Msg failed ORDB (Blackholed by ORDB -- see
 > http://ordb.org/lookup/?host=200.190.82.26).
 > 11/04/2001 03:57:02 Q02d5274 Msg failed SPAMCOP (Blocked - see
 > http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?200.190.82.26).
 > 11/04/2001 03:57:02 Q02d5274 Msg failed SPAMHEADERS (This E-mail has 
headers
 > consistent with spam [60000303].).
 > 11/04/2001 03:57:02 Q02d5274 Msg failed SPAMROUTING (This E-mail was routed
 > in a poor manner consistent with spam [60000303].).

I also count 14 for this one.  The next release will include a line that 
shows exactly how the value is calculated.  Every one I've checked here has 
added up correctly, but the new log file entry will show what Declude is 
thinking.
                                                            -Scott

---

This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance.  You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .

Reply via email to