Hi,
Thanks, Andy Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.thumpernet.com 315-282-0020 Friday, January 04, 2002, 12:04:59 PM, you wrote: RH> Reply to: andyb@thumpernet RH> Re: [Declude.JunkMail] mailing lists on Friday 10:53:25 AM RH> We do not take this approach. We made everything WARN except RH> WEIGHT10 which is HOLD. Then we give SpamCop a '9' weight. RH> We make other weights to trigger the WEIGHT10 hold if more RH> than SpamCop occurs. If only SpamCop occurs, then the mail RH> is delivered. Basically, we ask other resources to 'confirm' RH> SpamCop... and we have almost no legitimate email being RH> captured at all. I agree that this is working better than ever. I've considered doing it that way. Except there was soooo much stuff coming from pm0.net, that i had to kill it. And I found with the other tests I was using, it was all spam. So, have a config now that gives me really good filtering while still allowing some fexibility. The best I can hope for though I'm sure my configs will evolve as I do. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
