Anyone want to compare/share some of their successful weighting configurations? For the last few months we have been successful catching 1000's of confirmed SPAM daily with only a few (2-5) false positives/day. I changed SPAMCOP this morning from HOLD to WARN because I am seeing an increase in false positives (about 20+/day over the past week). Now I am concerned that by taking off the HOLD on SPAMCOP that we are going to start seeing a significant increase of confirmed SPAM get through. I hope to set-up the weighting better to try and make up the difference. I am thinking about also adding the sniffer filter and currently studying the docs now. This is what we currently have set-up below. Scott told me one time this is more of an Art than a Science. Thanks to anyone that can help out!
Don CompBiz, Inc. www.compbiz.net ------------------------ GLOBAL.CFG & Weights ORBZIN 5 ORBZOUT 5 ORDB 5 OSDUL 5 OSFORM 5 OSLIST 5 OSRELAY 5 OSSMART 5 OSSOFT 5 OSSRC 5 SPAMCOP 10 DSN 5 NOABUSE 5 NOPOSTMASTER 5 BADHEADERS 8 MAILFROM 12 PERCENT 10 REVDNS 5 ROUTING 5 SPAMHEADERS 5 WEIGHT10 weight x x 10 0 WEIGHT20 weight x x 20 0 $default$.junkmail ORBZIN WARN ORBZOUT WARN ORDB HOLD OSDUL HOLD OSFORM WARN OSLIST WARN OSRELAY WARN OSSMART WARN OSSOFT HOLD OSSRC HOLD SPAMCOP WARN DSN WARN NOABUSE WARN NOPOSTMASTER WARN BADHEADERS WARN MAILFROM HOLD PERCENT HOLD REVDNS WARN ROUTING WARN SPAMHEADERS WARN #SNIFFER WARN WEIGHT10 WARN WEIGHT20 HOLD --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
