Mike, Would it be possible for you to send me your global and your default files so I can compare them to mine. I do like that setup that you have and want to check on more.
Jeff ****************************************************************** TymeWyse Internet P.O.Box 84 - 583 N. Main St., Canyonville, OR 97417 tel/fax: (541) 839-6027 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] ****************************************************************** ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Nice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:26 AM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Comparing Weight Configurations > OSRELAY 5 0 > OSDUL 5 0 > OSSRC 5 0 > OSSMART 5 0 > OSSOFT 5 0 > OSLIST 5 0 > OSFORM 5 0 > ORDB 5 0 > SPAMCOP 5 0 > DSN 5 0 > NOPOSTMASTER 5 0 > NOABUSE 5 0 > BADWHOIS 3 0 > IPWHOIS 3 0 > > MAILFROM envfrom x x 2 0 > BADHEADERS badheaders x x 0 0 > SPAMHEADERS spamheaders x x 3 0 > ROUTING spamrouting x x 9 0 > REVDNS revdnsexists x x 5 0 > CATCHALLMAILS catchallmails x x 0 0 > > WEIGHT15 weight x x 15 0 > > > > ALONG WITH WHITELIST for Microsoft (king of the RFC-Ignorant) passport and > expedia mailers - > > WHITELIST FROM [EMAIL PROTECTED] > WHITELIST FROM @msnnewsletters.customer-email.com > WHITELIST FROM @expedia.com > > > My goal is to minimize the number of false-positives to near zero. I had > to back down the BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS because they mostly represent > automated mailing programs. There are many of these in use all over for > legitimate purposes - shopping carts, confirmations, signups, etc that > people want to receive. I'm sure Spammers monitor this list and have > already made their mailblaster headers to mimic MS Outlook and be > RFC-Compliant. But admittedly, there are still a bunch of losers running > the old spam blasting software though. > > The only remaining false positives are related to the obligitory self-run > E-mail system that many small companies want to run. Of course they have no > reverse DNS, they are open relay, and because of the open relay they end up > in the Spamcop database. Normally, this 3-strikes would be considered spam. > There have been a number of these from local companies that I had to > whitelist because the E-mail customer would expect delivery or a bounce > message. > > I could back down ORDB weighting if I add the sniffer technology to the > mix. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Don Schreiner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Declude List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:11 AM > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Comparing Weight Configurations > > > > Anyone want to compare/share some of their successful weighting > > configurations? > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web > site at http://www.declude.com . > > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
